Francis Baily (1774-1844)
Born: 28th April 1774 at Newbury, Berkshire
Astronomer
Died 30th August 1844 at St. Pancras, Middlesex
Born: 28th April 1774 at Newbury, Berkshire
Astronomer
Died 30th August 1844 at St. Pancras, Middlesex
Francis Baily, the eminent
astronomer, was the third of eight children of Mr. Richard Baily, a banker of Newbury in Berkshire, and Sarah Head,
his wife. Placed in a London mercantile house at the age of fourteen, the
acquaintance of Priestley developed his native taste for experimental inquiries.
But, though known amongst his young companions as the 'Philosopher of Newbury,'
love of adventure was, as yet, stronger in him than love of science, and his
seven years' apprenticeship had no sooner expired than he sailed for America, on
21st October 1796. The narrative of his experiences as a traveller is contained
in an extremely curious 'Journal of a Tour in Unsettled Parts of North America
in 1796 and 1797,' edited by Professor De Morgan in 1850, twelve years after the
death of the author.
They include two narrow escapes from shipwreck, a voyage in
an open boat down the Ohio and Mississippi from Pittsburg to New Orleans, and a
return journey to New York across nearly 2,000 miles of 'wilderness' uninhabited
except by Native Americans. A matrimonial project was vaguely indicated, in
connection with some steps towards naturalization and permanent residence in the
United States, but proved abortive and he landed back in Bristol on 1st March
1798, and went home to Newbury. The roving tendency, none the less, was still
strong upon him. In May 1799, he volunteered to travel in the service of the
African Association, having formed a plan of exploration on the Niger, which, he
informed Sir John Stepney, he "would have gone through any trials" to carry out.
Funds, however, were deficient and, after some futile thoughts of a commission
in the engineers or militia, he accommodated himself to the prosaic destiny of a
stockbroker, entering into partnership, about the end of 1799, with Mr.
Whitmore, of the London Stock Exchange.
With characteristic thoroughness,
Baily now engaged in commercial pursuits. He became a consummate man of
business, earning, besides a considerable fortune, an unsurpassed reputation for
integrity and intelligence. His complete identification with his profession was
shown in a pamphlet defending its rights against the encroachments of the City
of London in 1806, as well as by the active part taken by him in the exposure of
the Berenger fraud in 1814. To his sagacity in preparing the evidence, the
success of the prosecution was considered to be in great measure, if not wholly,
due; and the three reports (printed 1814-15) of the committee, appointed by the
Stock Exchange to investigate the subject, were drawn up by him. A series of
remarkable publications meanwhile attested his varied powers. The first of these
was entitled 'Tables for the Purchasing and Renewing of Leases' (1802). Its
success encouraged him to pursue the subject in two works of standard authority,
the 'Doctrine of Interest and Annuities analytically investigated and explained'
(1808) and the 'Doctrine of Life-Annuities and Assurances analytically
investigated and practically explained' (1810). The fourteenth chapter of the
latter, separately reprinted with the title 'An Account of the several
Life-Assurance Companies established in London, containing a View of their
respective Merits and Advantages,' was greedily bought up in two editions (1810
& 1811) and the treatise itself was translated into French under the
auspices of the 'Compognie d'Assurances Generales sur la Vie' (1836). In this
country, the demand was such that copies sold for £4 or £5 and the price of an
appendix to the second issue (1813), containing an exposition of Barrett's mode
of computing life-tables, alone rose to a guinea. This scarcity induced a
fraudulent reprint, succeeded by an avowed republication in 1864 (with omission
of the fourteenth chapter and appendix), under the care of Mr. Filipowski.
Baily's merits as a writer on life-contingencies were undoubtedly very great.
The subject was, by him, first presented in a symmetrical form, a uniform system
of notation was introduced and, to a perspicuous and comprehensive view of the
labours of his predecessors, the results of much original research were
added.
Baily’s divergence into a new field
was marked by the publication, in 1812, of 'A New Chart of History,' accompanied
by a 'Description' - of which five editions were sold in three years -
exhibiting the chief revolutions of empire during the historical period. The
preparation of chronological tables for an 'Epitome of Universal History' (1813)
led to his first essay in astronomy. A paper 'On the Solar Eclipse which is said
to have been predicted by Thales,' read before the Royal Society on 14th March
1811, proved him a skilled computist; but the date assigned, 30th September 610
bc, was shown, by his own appended investigation of the eclipse of Agathocles
(15th August 310 bc), to be insecure and was corrected by Sir George Airy, with
the aid of improved lunar tables, to 28th May AD 585.
Baily’s interest in astronomical
subjects henceforth grew and developed. He wrote a pamphlet, in 1818, summoning
attention to the annular eclipse of 7th September 1820, which he himself
observed at Kentish Town. In 1819, he translated Cagnoli's 'Method of
ascertaining the Figure of the Earth by means of Occultations of the Fixed
Stars' and powerfully helped to quicken astronomical progress in England by his
frequent notices, in the 'Philosophical Magazine,' of foreign improvements and
publications. But the establishment of the Astronomical Society formed, in the
words of Sir John Herschel, son of the famous Sir
William, "a chief and deciding epoch in his life." He was one of the
fourteen who met at the Freemasons' Tavern, on 12th January 1820, and
constituted themselves a corporate body with that title. And upon Baily, as its
acting secretary during the first three years of its existence, devolved the
chief labour of its organisation. By him, its rules were framed, the routine of
its business fixed and its finances set in order. He was a member of every
committee, regulated every undertaking, guided every negotiation, drew up nearly
every report. By his judicious action, the society was, in 1834, put in
possession of spacious apartments in Somerset House and, upon the death of
George IV, raised to an equal footing with the Royal Society on the visiting
board of the Royal Observatory. He was four times elected its president (for
terms of two years), eleven times vice-president and invariably sat on the
council.
In 1825, Baily retired from business,
purchased a house and sycamore-shaded garden at 37 Tavistock Place (St.
Pancras), and devoted himself wholly to astronomy. He was then fifty-one; but,
in the nineteen years remaining to him, he executed labours, the extent and
value of which it is difficult, in a brief summary, adequately to describe.
Although not himself an habitual observer, the scope of his efforts was directed
to imparting a higher value to the observations of others, both by connecting
them with the past and by assuring them for the future. His revision of star
catalogues alone entitled him, in Sir John Herschel's opinion, to rank amongst
the greatest benefactors to astronomy. Those of Ptolemy, Ulugh Beigh, Tycho
Brahe, Halley, and Hevelius, he corrected with vast expenditure of time and
care; and furnished each with a valuable preface, which were printed in 1843, at
his own cost, as volume 13 of the 'Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society.'
The star catalogue of Tobias Mayer - the publication of which he had procured by
the Board of Longitude in 1826 - he revised from the original observations, the
result forming part of volume 4 of the society's 'Memoirs' and appearing also
separately (1830). A comparison of most of its 968 stars with their places as
given by Bradley was added, besides forty-five supplementary stars.
The perusal, in 1832, of Flamsteed's
autograph letters to his ex-assistant, Abraham Sharp, lent to Baily by his
neighbour, Mr. E. Giles, induced him to examine the entire mass of his
manuscripts, which had lain mouldering for sixty years in the library at
Greenwich. He soon came to the conclusion that Flamsteed's character, both
personal and scientific, had been grievously misrepresented and wrote to the
Duke of Sussex, president of the board of visitors of the Royal Observatory,
suggesting the propriety of a republication of the 'British Catalogue,' with
such selections from authentic documents as might serve to rectify prevalent
errors in regard to the conduct and motives of its author. The recommendation
was adopted and a massive quarto volume, entitled 'An Account of the Rev. John
Flamsteed, the first Astronomer Royal,' was issued under Baily's care, at public
expense, in 1835. This remarkable production threw a flood of light on
Flamsteed's relations with his contemporaries. It included several
autobiographical fragments, forming a tolerably complete whole, a vast mass of
previously unpublished correspondence, besides the revised and annotated
catalogue, reinforced with Miss Herschel's list of 564 inedited stars from
Flamsteed's autograph entries (previously arranged by Baily in order of right
ascension in Memoirs RAS 4). Baily's historical introduction, preface to the
catalogue and appendix (issued in January 1837) exhibited, in a succinct form,
the results of much patient and profound research.
The reduction of the catalogues of
Lalande and Lacaille, by which these great stores of celestial information were
first rendered practically available, was undertaken, at the insistence of
Baily, by the British Association in 1837-8. In 1842, he had accomplished the
arduous task of deducing the mean average from the apparent places of 47,390
stars in the 'Histoire Celeste.' Having seen both works through the press (the
reduction of Lacaille's 9,766 southern stars having been executed by Henderson),
he was overtaken by death. Their publication was, after many delays, completed
in 1847, the cost of reduction being defrayed by the association, that of
printing by the government.
Early in his astronomical career,
Baily became impressed with the urgent need of a remedy for the prevalent
confusion regarding the corrections for aberration, nutation and so on, and had
already, in 1822 with the aid of Gompertz, devised a means of simplifying their
application, when No. 4 of the 'Astronomische Nachrichten,' containing Bessel's
similar, but more comprehensive improvement, was put into his hands. Discarding,
without a murmur, his private claims as an inventor, he immediately proceeded to
publish and recommend the method by which they had been superseded. This, he
most effectually accomplished in the 'Astronomical Society's Catalogue' of 2,881
stars (epoch 1st January 1830), accompanied by tables for reduction, constructed
on the new system, forming a boon of inestimable value to practical astronomers.
It was printed as an appendix to the second volume of the society's 'Memoirs' in
1827. The merit of the compilation can best be estimated by a reference to Sir
John Herschel's address in presenting Baily with the Astronomical Society's gold
medal on 11th April 1827.
The same principles were still
further extended in the 'Catalogue of the British Association.' Not only the
number of stars was increased to 8,377 (reduced to 1st January 1850) but proper
motions, when determinable, were inserted with, in all cases, the secular
variation of the annual precessions. Resolved upon, at the Liverpool meeting of
the British Association in 1837, the work was wholly superintended by Baily and
was left by him, at his death, almost complete. It was published in 1845 at the
public cost and is still in high repute.
Owing to the deficiency of reliable
materials, however, the places of many of the southern stars included in it were
found defective and were immediately revised by Maclear at the Cape of Good
Hope. The value of this catalogue, as well as of the two others compiled under
the same authority (those of Lalande and Lacaille), was much enhanced by the
uniform system of nomenclature adopted throughout. This material improvement was
the result of Baily's severe labours in revising the boundaries of the
constellations and marshalling into a recognisable order the stars composing
them. A paper on the subject, read by him before the Royal Astronomical Society
on 12th May 1843, was appended to the report of a committee (consisting of
Herschel, Whewell, and Baily) appointed by the British Association in 1840 to
consider the subject, and was also reprinted in his introduction to the
'Catalogue.'
The reform of the 'Nautical Almanac'
was another of the benefits derived by science from Baily’s zeal. It was
rendered inevitable by his strictures on its deficiencies in 1819, 1822 and
1829; and, the admiralty having - upon the death of the superintendent, Dr.
Thomas Young, on 10th May 1829 - submitted the matter to the Astronomical
Society, Baily formed one of the deliberating committee and drew up the report
upon which the National Ephemeris was modelled.
In view of Captain Foster's proposed
expedition, Baily devised, in 1828, a simplified kind of convertible pendulum of
which two specimens, of iron and copper respectively, formed part of the
scientific equipment of the Chanticleer. The accidental death of her commander,
on 5th February 1831, threw upon him the onerous duty of digesting and
completing (by swinging the pendulums in London) the numerous observations made
in both hemispheres; and his elaborate and admirable report, presented to the
admiralty and ordered to be printed at the government expense, filled the entire
seventh volume of the 'Royal Astronomical Society's Memoirs.' The general result
of 20,000 experiments gave 1/289.48 for the ellipticity of the earth, showing a
most satisfactory agreement with Sabine's of 1/288.40.
Meanwhile, Baily had prosecuted,
independently, a research entitling him to a distinguished share of merit in the
determination of the length of the seconds' pendulum.
Bessel pointed out in 1828
that, in the received 'correction for buoyancy,' no allowance was made for the
expenditure of force in setting the particles of surrounding air in motion. In
order to estimate, with precision, this neglected element of reduction, Baily
had a vacuum apparatus erected in his house and, there, carried out, in 1831-2,
a series of most delicate experiments on eighty-six pendulums of every variety
of form and material, of which the details were communicated to the Royal
Society on 31st May 1832. It appeared, thence, that the value of the new
correction, while varying very sensibly with the shape and size of the pendulum,
was in many cases more than double the old. The subject of the length of the
seconds pendulum led naturally to that of the national unit of length, defined
by act 5 George IV in terms of that (as it had now proved) uncertain quantity.
Baily, accordingly, obtained, from the Royal Astronomical Society in 1833,
authority to construct for them a tubular scale of five feet, the accuracy of
which had been ascertained by repeated comparisons with the standard yard, when
the latter was irreparably injured in the conflagration of the houses of
parliament on 16th October 1834. A commission of seven, appointed on 11th May
1838, to consider the best means of replacing it, included him amongst its
members; and to him was entrusted, in 1843 by the unanimous desire of his
colleagues, the actual reconstruction of the standards of length, in the
preparatory experiments for which laborious task he was arrested by fatal
illness.
The most arduous and conspicuous
labour of his life has still to be adverted to. This was the repetition of the
'Cavendish Experiment' for measuring the density of the earth. The principle of
this research depends upon the comparison between the observed attractive
effects of masses of ascertained weight and density with the known force of
gravity at the earth's surface; but its adequate execution is attended by
difficulties of the most baffling description. A remark made, by Professor De
Morgan at the council table of the Royal Astronomical Society occasioned the
appointment, in 1835, of a committee to consider the matter; but no progress was
made until Baily offered his services in 1837, and the treasury granted £500
towards expenses. The operation, conducted in an upper room of his house, twelve
feet square, lasted from October 1838 to May 1842, and resulted in establishing,
within narrow limits of error, that our globe is composed of materials, on an
average, 5.66 times as heavy as water. Nevertheless, in spite of precautions
incredibly minute, the experiments were vitiated during eighteen months by an
unknown cause of error. Ultimate success seemed scarcely to be hoped for, yet
Baily resolved to persevere; and to this determination, Lord Wrottesley
remarked, it is due that his memoir (occupying the entire 14th volume of Mem.
RAS) "is hardly less valuable as a lesson upon the nature and use of the torsion
pendulum in measuring small forces than as a determination of the mean density
of the earth." It was, at length, suggested by Professor Forbes that the
anomalies in question might be due to the radiation of heat from the leaden
masses employed to deflect the pendulum, and proposed gilding both them and the
torsion-box. The remedy was completely successful and the process, begun de novo
in January 1841, was conducted to a successful issue. The printed observations
numbered 2,153 (besides upwards of a thousand rejected as untrustworthy),
varying in duration from ten to thirty minutes. This memorable labour was
rewarded with the Royal Astronomical Society's gold medal - of which Baily thus
for the second time became the recipient - on 10th February 1843.
The few noteworthy observations of
the heavens made by Baily referred, singularly enough, to the subject of his
first astronomical investigation. On 15th May 1836, while watching an annular
eclipse of the sun at Inch Bonney, near Jedburgh, he witnessed a phenomenon to
which he first directed explicit attention and which, from his vivid
description, received the name of 'Baily's Beads.' It consists of the breaking
up of the fine solar crescent visible at the beginning and end of central
eclipses into a row of lucid points, the intervals separating which, at times,
appear to be drawn out, as the moon advances, into dark lines or belts: the
whole being a combined effect of irradiation and the inequalities of the moon's
edge. Baily's narrative excited strong interest and effectively roused
astronomers to the importance of eclipses under their physical aspect, that of
8th July 1842 being, at his suggestion, prepared for with this view. Baily
observed it from an empty room in the university of Pavia, with the some
instrument (a 3½ foot Dollond's achromatic) used at Inch Hominy. The 'beads'
were less conspicuous than before; but he was, in his own words, "electrified"
by the unexpected and "appalling" splendour of the corona, through which rose
three vast prominences resembling the "snowy tops of Alpine mountains when
coloured by the rising or the setting sun". But towards the solution of the
magnificent problem, thus presented to science, he did not live to see any
advance made.
In June 1841, Francis Baily was
knocked down by a furious rider, while crossing Wellington Street, and lay for a
week senseless. Nevertheless, he completely recovered and was able to resume his
experiments in weighing the earth by the end of September. It was not until the
Spring of 1844 that his health, until then remarkably stable, finally gave way.
Although he rallied sufficiently to attend commemoration at Oxford, when an
honorary degree of DCL - previously, in 1835, received from the University of
Dublin - was conferred upon him, in company with Airy and Struve. Soon after his
return to London, however, an internal complaint became manifest and he sank
gradually and without pain, expiring on 30th August 1844, aged 70. He was, at
the time, President of the Royal Astronomical Society and was buried in his
family’s vault in Thatcham
Church, near Newbury.
The abilities of Francis Baily were
not of the highest order. As a mathematician, his range was a limited one. He
never mastered the refinements of modern analysis and was frequently indebted to
the aid of Professors Airy and De Morgan in working out his investigations. Nor
was his mind visited by any of the luminous inspirations of genius. Yet his life
presents an almost unique example of laborious usefulness to science. More than
to any single individual, the rapid general advance of practical astronomy in
the British Isles was due to him. To clear discernment of the precise wants of
his time, he joined untiring activity in supplying them. His organising energy
was guided by a tact which rendered it irresistible. Add a rare faculty of order
and concentration, with a perfect knowledge of and complete mastery over his
powers, and the sources of his almost unparalleled effectiveness as a worker
become in some degree apparent. Besides the special tasks executed by him with
astonishing thoroughness, precision and rapidity, he took a leading part in the
general conduct of scientific affairs. He was unfailing at the annual visitation
of the Royal Observatory during twenty-seven years. He succeeded Babbage, in
1839, as permanent trustee of the British Association and had belonged to its
council for two years previously.
He aided in the foundation, in 1830, and
became vice-president of the Geographical Society; acted, during considerable
periods, as vice-president and treasurer of the Royal Society, generally held a
seat on the council, and rarely missed one of its meetings from the date of his
election as a fellow on 22nd February 1821. Scientific distinctions were
showered upon him. He was a fellow of the Linnean and Geological societies, a
corresponding member of the Institute of France, of the Academies of Berlin,
Naples and Palermo, and was enrolled on the lists of the American and Royal
Irish Academies. Few men have left behind them so enviable a reputation. He was
gentle as well as just. He loved and sought truth. He inspired, in an equal
degree, respect and affection. He was never married and his sister, Miss
Elizabeth Baily, who survived him fifteen years, superintended his hospitable
establishment.
No comments:
Post a Comment